solved Can the number of allowed profiles be 1 while the number of allowed quotas is 2?

researchcooperative
@researchcooperative
6 years ago
694 posts
1. I would like members to manage just one profile, but have ability to switch to another profile in another quota, leaving the first profile behind. And perhaps to be able to switch back again to the first profile.

2. If this can only be achieved only by switching Privacy settings, some users might not realize that they can make one profile private, and one public, and might end up trying to manage two public profiles with overlapping functions, which would be confusing for everyone.

3. What am thinking to offer is:
-- a simple signup profile with limited functions (blog, followers, gallery) (in a "standard regular member" quota) and
--a more complex profile with further functions added (e.g. group, files, pages) (in an "advanced regular member" quota that is not a signup quota)

4. Can we set the number of allowed profiles at 1 for the signup quota, and also just 1 for the "advanced regular member" quota, and allow users in both quotas to be "power users" for whom the two quotas are displayed and thus made available?

(i.e. after signup, can the user switch to another profile in a different quota, and abandon the first profile in the signup quota?)

5. Or does the number of profiles have to match the number of quotas made available, or be at least two for a power user with access to two or more quotas?

(meaning that the original profile associated with an account cannot be abandoned)?

6. Perhaps the simplest solution is to only let users have an "Advanced Regular Member" profile by asking Admin to manually switch their entire account from one quota to another.

I think I have persuaded myself to take the last route - Route 6.

This is likely easier than offering complex alternatives and then having to tell members how to switch between them.


--
PJ Matthews, Kyoto
Migrated from Ning 2.0. Now at Jamroom 6 beta and using Jamroom Hosting for The Research Cooperative (researchcooperative.org)

updated by @researchcooperative: 05/05/18 09:53:16AM
nate
@nate
6 years ago
917 posts
You want to look for "Allow Quota Changes" in the profile global config.
SteveX
SteveX
@ultrajam
6 years ago
2,584 posts
It’s the same profile, only the quota changes. That gives the profile different capabilities and features. Read the beginners guide to profiles and quotas in the docs.


--
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Education, learning resources, TEL, AR/VR/MR, CC licensed content, panoramas, interactive narrative, sectional modules (like jrDocs), lunch at Uni of Bristol. Get in touch if you share my current interests or can suggest better :)
researchcooperative
@researchcooperative
6 years ago
694 posts
Thanks.

I think from past experience, I have found that when a profile is moved into a new quota with different modules active, content that depended on a module that is not active in the new quota is not actually lost.

But this may not be explained in the Documention.

To what extent can a profile be moved back and forth between quotas with very different modules active? I am not wanting to do this on a regular basis of course. I just want to understand what the limits of the system are.


--
PJ Matthews, Kyoto
Migrated from Ning 2.0. Now at Jamroom 6 beta and using Jamroom Hosting for The Research Cooperative (researchcooperative.org)

updated by @researchcooperative: 02/01/18 09:40:48PM
SteveX
SteveX
@ultrajam
6 years ago
2,584 posts
Give it a try!

Nothing will be lost. If you have a profile with blog posts which gets moved to a quota where blog posts are not allowed the blog features are removed but the posts remain in the database. You can then try out moving the profile back to a quota which allows blogs - the posts will reappear.


--
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Education, learning resources, TEL, AR/VR/MR, CC licensed content, panoramas, interactive narrative, sectional modules (like jrDocs), lunch at Uni of Bristol. Get in touch if you share my current interests or can suggest better :)
researchcooperative
@researchcooperative
6 years ago
694 posts
This is surely magic.

Now all we need to do is turn this into a mechanism for making online currencies appear and disappear at will... and we can buy the world.

Thanks. I will call this thread solved.


--
PJ Matthews, Kyoto
Migrated from Ning 2.0. Now at Jamroom 6 beta and using Jamroom Hosting for The Research Cooperative (researchcooperative.org)