The Big Reverse of the Web

jimmyk
jimmyk
@jimmy
9 years ago
514 posts
The Big Reverse of the Web
By Dries Buytaert

I believe that for the web to reach its full potential, it will go through a massive re-architecture and re-platforming in the next decade. The current web is "pull-based", meaning we visit websites or download mobile applications. The future of the web is "push-based", meaning the web will be coming to us. In the next 10 years, we will witness a transformation from a pull-based web to a push-based web. When this "Big Reverse" is complete, the web will disappear into the background much like our electricity or water supply. We'll forget what 'www' stood for (which was kind of dumb to begin with). These are bold statements, I understand, but let me explain you why.

In the future, content, products and services will find you, rather than you having to find them. Puma will let us know to replace our shoes and Marriott will automatically present you room options if you missed your connecting flight. Instead of visiting a website, we will proactively be notified of what is relevant and asked to take action. The dominant function of the web is to let us know what is happening or what is relevant, rather than us having to find out.

Facebook and Flipboard are early examples of what such push-based experience looks like. Facebook "pushes" a stream of personalized information designed to tell you what is happening with your friends and family; you no longer have "pull" them and ask how they are doing. Flipboard changes how we consume content by aggregating the best of the web and filtering it based on our interests; it "pushes" the relevant and interesting content to you rather than you having to "pull" the news from multiple sources. Also consider the rise of notification-centric experiences; your smartphone's notification center provides you with a stream of relevant information that is pushed to you. More recently, these notifications have become interactive; you can check in for a flight without having to open your travel app. You can buy a product without having to visit their website.

What people really want is to tune into information rather than having to work to get information. It saves them time and effort and in the long run, an improved user experience always wins. In most cases, "Show me what I want" is more useful than "Let me search around and see what I can find".

With some imagination, it's not too hard to picture how these kind of experiences could expand to other areas of the web. The way the e-commerce works today is really no different than having to visit a lot of separate physical stores or wading through hundreds of products in a department store. We shouldn't have to work so hard to find what we want. In a push-based world, we would sit back as if we were watching a fashion show -- the clothing presented could come for hundreds of different online brands but the stream is "personalized" to our needs, budget, sizes and style preferences. When the Big Reverse is complete, it will be the end of department stores and malls. Keep an eye on personalized clothing services like Trunk Club or Stitch Fix.

Ten years from now we're going to look back and recognize that search-based content discovery was broken. Today the burden is put on the user to find relevant content either via directly typing in a URL or by crafting complex search queries. While pull-based experiences might not go away; push-based experiences will dominate as they will prove to be much more efficient.

Many of you won't like it (at first), but push will win over pull. Healthcare is going through a similar transformation from pull to push; instead of going to a doctor, we'll have web-enabled hardware and software that is able to self-diagnose. Wearables like activity trackers are just the start of decades of innovation and opportunity in healthcare. Helped by the web, education is also moving from pull to push. Why go to a classroom when personalized training can come to you?

We are at the beginning of a transition bridging two distinctly different types of economies. First, a "push economy" that tries to anticipate consumer demand, creates standardized or generic products in large amounts, and "pushes" them into the market via global distribution channels and marketing. Now, a "pull economy" that—rather than creating standardized products—will create highly customized products and services produced on-demand and delivered to consumers through one-on-one relationships and truly personal experiences.

This new paradigm could be a very dramatic shift that disrupts many existing business models; advertising, search engines, app stores, online and offline retailers, and much more. For middlemen like online retailers or search engines, the push-based means they risk being disintermediated as the distribution chain becomes less useful. It marks a powerful transformation that dematerializes and de-monetizes much of the current web. While this might complicate the lives of many organizations, it will undoubtedly simplify and better the lives of consumers everywhere.

http://buytaert.net/the-big-reverse-of-the-web

updated by @jimmy: 04/13/15 02:02:45AM
brian
@brian
9 years ago
10,148 posts
jimmyk:
In the future, content, products and services will find you, rather than you having to find them. Puma will let us know to replace our shoes and Marriott will automatically present you room options if you missed your connecting flight. Instead of visiting a website, we will proactively be notified of what is relevant and asked to take action. The dominant function of the web is to let us know what is happening or what is relevant, rather than us having to find out.

Maybe I'm just "old" and don't get it - I mean I completely understand from a technical standpoint, but no thanks - I don't want any "content producers" finding me. I don't want technology following me around and trying to "figure out" what I need. A future where we can't turn technology OFF and say "leave me alone" is one I don't want to be involved in.

Like I said - maybe I'm old and just don't "get it", but if "getting it" means Puma is going to be nagging me for new shoes no thanks - that's just the tip of the spam iceberg.

Quote:
What people really want is to tune into information rather than having to work to get information

Isn't this TV? I like working for my information since it means I can weed out what I don't want. No "automated learning algorithm" is ever going to replace that.

This whole post is too optimistic about a world without privacy and how if we all just drink the koolaid it would be AWESOME - the whole thing however is just a big circle jerk by Silicon Valley startups trying to be the "next" Facebook.


--
Brian Johnson
Founder and Lead Developer - Jamroom
https://www.jamroom.net

updated by @brian: 03/11/15 03:34:47PM
derrickhand300
@derrickhand300
9 years ago
1,353 posts
The world is becoming a place where there is little individual responsibility- People growing up today seem to need someone else or some else's technology to think for them.
News media here has taken the lead and tell their viewers what they need to think concerning just about anything- today's morons adopt those views of their favorite media so they don't have to waste their valuable gamimg time trying to reason out a correct stance on ANY issue.
More of the "I read it on the internet so it has to be true" crap- then spew those "facts" as hard researched positions of your own...:) Sorry, I digress...
jimmyk
jimmyk
@jimmy
9 years ago
514 posts
@brian - I'm of the same thinking as you. But I think the younger generation is more willing to give up their privacy for convenience. There is a whole swath of people - younger and older / not technical / trusting - who just go with the flow, clicking buttons without questioning what clicking the button means... kinda how I sign long forms from the bank.

The post is very optimistic, but realistic. Big companies what exactly what he's saying... feeding information to the masses while data mining the masses.

@derrickhand300 - bingo. Dead on.
updated by @jimmy: 03/13/15 12:54:36PM
SteveX
SteveX
@ultrajam
9 years ago
2,584 posts
I don't think the younger generation are really applying will whilst giving up their privacy. To start with, they've grown up in a world of reduced privacy, and we did that to them. They didn't invent or implement current thinking/technology, just picked it up and ran with it (hopefully) from an early age. Privacy is much less of an option for the younger generation than it is for us - and what real option do we oldies have? (us who set it up for these youngsters?).

Quote: People growing up today seem to need someone else or some else's technology to think for them.
We all take the best shortcuts available to us at the time. I use Jamroom (thankfully never ning) and heavily rely on the thinking and experience of the team to inform me on what I need and to give me a head start on how I need to do it. I can trust a whole load of thinking to them, and add my own to make it my own. Excellent shortcut.

Most people working websites are still growing up today, however old they are. And they will still be growing up tomorrow unless they are dead in some way.


--
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Education, learning resources, TEL, AR/VR/MR, CC licensed content, panoramas, interactive narrative, sectional modules (like jrDocs), lunch at Uni of Bristol. Get in touch if you share my current interests or can suggest better :)

Tags