Perhaps one way around the problem is for JR or someone working with JR to build a series of template sites that demonstrate some of the range of what can be done with JR, from simple to complex, e.g.:
Minimal interactive
1. A text library site, with searchable catalogue, and a single tier of membership.
2. A music library site, with searchable catalogue, and a single tier of membership.
3. A video library site, with searchable catalogue, and a single tier of membership.
4. A photo library site, with searchable catalogue, and a single tier of membership.
Maximum interactive
5. A subject-focussed site, with forums and pages for several sub-categories, and profile options that allow members to set up different profiles in each sub-category.
A sales site
6. Single company website with searchable forum for interaction with customers, a searchable sales catalogue, and a sales page.
7. Multiple company site, each with independent searchable forum for interaction with customers, a searchable sales catalogue, and a sales page.
In each case, the same site could be shown with (a) the basic JR look, and (b) a fully-styled version.
The above set of templates could then be remixed by users according a 7! matrix, i.e. using the templates in 7x6x5x4x3x2 different combinations. One potential high-value customer group for JR sites may be large museums that want to develop interactive multi-media databases that showcase collections and allow visitors to submit information and ask questions. On top of this, all the content needs to have machine searchable URLs that allow individual museums to integrate their content with other museums, while retaining control over their own content. I think JR can support all of this, but it would need a JR developer to work with a museum systems developer to build and demonstrate this. Perhaps a company museum like the Toyota Company Museum could sponsor this kind of development work.
I agree that the present small JR development team has more fundamental work to be busy with, but ultimately, the user-friendly presentation of options is what non-developers need to see in order to judge if they want to use JR.
With templates, it is possible to have a page explaining exactly how each site is constructed, and to have a systematically constructed set for display, as a JR shopfront. This is different from the unexplained variety of existing JR sites that are currently displayed as examples at JR.
--
PJ Matthews, Kyoto
Migrated from Ning 2.0. Now at Jamroom 6 beta and using Jamroom Hosting for The Research Cooperative (researchcooperative.org)
updated by @researchcooperative: 07/17/15 09:30:46PM