Forum Activity for @dannya

alt=
@dannya
07/12/16 08:22:29AM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

Hi Brian,

Just wanted to check in and see if you figured out the issue with the 404 error. It's a blocker for us now.
alt=
@dannya
07/10/16 09:58:36AM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

That does. Thanks. (I don't know how you managed to get the answers out before I even hit send!)
alt=
@dannya
07/10/16 09:52:20AM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

Sounds promising. A couple of questions:

1. Can different types of encoding jobs have different priorities? Or Is it just by job TYPE.
2. Is there a reason you went with just high/low vs a numerical value? It seems a numerical value would give you much more control.
3. When is this release expected?


FYI, the use case for the queue status is for managing queues as well. I am trying to use the queue status to autoscale a cluster of conversion servers OR send overflow to AWS elastic transcoder if the queue length gets too long. It seems like a conversion server can only process a few jobs concurrently (depending on memory and number of cpu cores), so if more than a couple of users are uploading at a time, the queue can really get backed up quickly.
updated by @dannya: 07/10/16 09:57:20AM
alt=
@dannya
07/10/16 09:01:48AM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

Email is was not a big of a deal for me, but now that you mention it I think it became much more relevent.

My use case was more for encoding priority. I encode to multiple formats; however only one is needed before the file is available to the player. I wanted to make sure that one gets processed right away so the user is not waiting.

I didn't think email was an issue, because I wasn't using the conversion server to send emails. But now that you mention it, I didn't realize emails were getting held up by conversions. I thought the email would get picked up by the email server regardless of the conversion jobs in the queue. I hope that is the case and maybe you can confirm.

If that's still true, one approach to prioritization is to dedicate servers to certain types of queue jobs; so that they don't get held up by conversions. However, I'd still like to assign a priority to the conversions.
alt=
@dannya
07/09/16 04:26:46PM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

Ok. Thanks. Just saw the other one too. I was hoping Pauls answer was not definitive. May have to do something custom unless you have any plans to do something. It would be great to set a PRIORITY parameter on a job and have the client execute the highest priority job first.
updated by @dannya: 07/09/16 04:28:29PM
alt=
@dannya
07/09/16 12:57:27PM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

To be clear cloud queue server is working, but we are still getting the error for the get active queue info function. Also still hoping for answer for other thread about queue prioritization.
alt=
@dannya
07/08/16 03:11:29PM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

Yes. Cloud core is configured. The queue server is otherwise working and doling out tasks to conversion servers.
alt=
@dannya
07/08/16 12:45:14PM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

Error now 404 instead of 400

Array
(
[code] => 404
[text] => Not Found
)
alt=
@dannya
07/08/16 09:46:22AM
584 posts

Queue depth status


Using Jamroom

Using this, we are getting the following error
Array
(
[code] => 400
[text] => Bad Request
[note] => invalid payload
)
alt=
@dannya
07/08/16 09:14:33AM
584 posts

Prioritizing queue jobs


Jamroom Developers

Bumping this
  11