Unable to change layout
Design and Skin Customization
I forgot all about GoDaddy. They walked me thru adding the info necessary for MailGun. I'll call them and see what they say.........
Forum Activity for @kos
Unable to change layout
Design and Skin Customization
He emailed me and said he was going to consult with you.
Unable to change layout
Design and Skin Customization
It's enormous and looks attributed to posts during migration. Should I email it over for your guys to view? Paul did my migration yesterday
updated by @kos: 02/10/15 09:40:01AM
Unable to change layout
Design and Skin Customization
Now my site is completely blank. A plain white screen.
Unable to change layout
Design and Skin Customization
I probably have something configured wrong since it's happened to me 3x now but the system checks don't show any problems. Just my luck!
Unable to change layout
Design and Skin Customization
Turns out it's affected my home page as well. Back to a 3-6-3 layout and will not allow me to change. I hadn't worked on that page at all today.
Paul is working on my migration this afternoon. Maybe that's causing it all. I will wait and see what shakes out.
Unable to change layout
Design and Skin Customization
This page will not allow me to switch layouts and if I create a new one, it's still stuck on 3-6-3 http://stockbuz2.net/create-a-petition
I did have a iframe displaying but removed it when this layout problem happened.
I've done the whole /repair=true
I searched the forums for repair layout, cleared cache, system check and integrity check came back fine.
This the 3rd time this has happened to me. I wish I knew what I was doing wrong to stop it from occurring in the future.
updated by @kos: 03/18/15 05:00:45AM
New Ning To Jamroom Support Forum
Ning To Jamroom
Well after 3 phone calls to GoDaddy, it's now miraculous working. Surprise surprise! LOL Thank goodness for small miracles.
New Ning To Jamroom Support Forum
Ning To Jamroom
I neglected to add, I tried the configuration wizard and it returned these results: (and I have keep settings alive - checked)
Connecting to probe.filezilla-project.org
Response: 220 FZ router and firewall tester ready
USER FileZilla
Response: 331 Give any password.
PASS 3.10.1.1
Response: 230 logged on.
Checking for correct external IP address
Retrieving external IP address from http://ip.filezilla-project.org/ip.php
Checking for correct external IP address
IP 70.122.200.211 ha-bcc-caa-cbb
Response: 200 OK
PREP 50033
Response: 200 Using port 50033, data token 1379260575
PORT 70,122,200,211,195,113
Connection timed out.
Connection closed
updated by @kos: 02/07/15 11:38:22AM
New Ning To Jamroom Support Forum
Ning To Jamroom
Paul
Let me know if you'd prefer me to enter this elsewhere but this forum seemed as good as any.
I'm back to battling with Filezilla so I can upload my Ning json files. I was obviously able to upload the Jamroom files a few weeks ago but since then, have not been able to connect with the server as indicated in this prior post. https://www.jamroom.net/the-jamroom-network/forum/installation-and-configuration/23416/filezilla-and-firewalls
FZ blames the server. GoDaddy says there's no problem on their end. Both finger pointing at one another.
FZ is free so one must wade thru their wiki and forums. My head's spinning. Here's what it's saying:
Status: Connecting to 160.153.53.105...
Response: fzSftp started
Command: open "admin@160.153.53.105" 22
Error: Network error: Software caused connection abort
Error: Could not connect to server
Status: Waiting to retry...
Status: Connecting to 160.153.53.105...
Response: fzSftp started
Command: open "admin@160.153.53.105" 22
Error: Network error: Software caused connection abort
Error: Could not connect to server
I've done a search here in JR for filezilla, did several web searches for "filezilla software caused connection abort" and the results are staggering. One gentlemen said "The clients were behind a dynamic NAT, on a DMZ, using a Cisco firewall. The outbound traffic was all behind a single dynamic IP address for the users (the ip address of the outside port). We had additional outside IP address space, so I placed the users behind a static nat. 3.3.1 now works fine. NO Server Fix required. For us, the optimization issue appears to be related to certain routers performing dynamic NAT, and TCP sequence numbers."
He may have as well be speaking in French - no clue what that means. LOL Any ideas what I should try?
